Direct or indirect, which method best is right for you? Well, of course that’s completely up to you to decide however there are a few factors you should
take into consideration.
Budget
The indirect/amped method is by far the most expensive option here. Minimally you will need a mic, a mic-preamp and a converter, which can become
very expensive. Direct recording eliminates the need for expensive microphones and amplifiers, as you will be plugging into a relatively cheap interface
unit, such as the M-Audio Black Box
Environment
Consider where you will actually be recording. Are you in a detached house where you can make more noise, or are you in an apartment block where
you have neighbours on all walls? Direct recording enables you to plug your clean, un-amped guitar straight into a unit that connects to your computer
producing minimal noise.
Whilst recording indirectly requires you to plug into a loud amplifier - whilst there are ways to help silence the amplifier such as placing it in an isolation
box (more on isolation boxes later) the environment you are in should be something you really take into consideration.
Sound
Can you achieve the sound you are looking for using the less expensive software method? If so, then definitely go for it, there’s no need to spend
hundreds and thousands on expensive equipment if you aren’t 100% sure you absolutely need to have it.
However, be sure to bear in mind that there really is something unique about the “old school” amped method that just can’t be achieved using computer
software packages, or modelled and emulated hardware. What I’m referring to here is the warmth, or pushed air. An amp pushes the speakers and
that pushed air really adds a lot to the overall sound that you’re hearing. While digitally modelled amp simulators can go a long way to creating the
beloved sound, they aren’t quite there just yet. |